*Diamond Member*
Posts: 52542
Liked By: 40542
Joined: 26 May 08
Followers:
53
Tipsters
Championship:
Player
has
not started
|
1x2 Sheffield Wed @3.60
Luton's home form hasn’t been stellar—they haven't won in their last two Championship matches at Kenilworth Road. So, while they’ve historically been solid against Sheffield Wednesday, their current form raises a few eyebrows. Does that home advantage still hold as much weight?
Flip the script and look at Sheffield Wednesday. Their away form has been nothing short of disastrous—they’ve yet to pick up a single point on the road this season. That’s not just a blip, it’s a trend that suggests vulnerability. But here’s the twist: Sheffield Wednesday are scoring more goals on average per game than Luton. How’s that for a statistical surprise?
"Margin of Safety" as the Central Concept of Betting
A team's past ability to create quality chances is the expected number of goals that they should have produced. The expected number of goals in excess of the actual number of goals constitutes the "margin of safety". The margin is counted on to cushion the bettor against discomfiture in the event of a performance decline in the upcoming fixture. The soccer bettor does not expect the upcoming fixture to work out the same as in the past. If he were sure of that, the safety margin demanded might be small. The function of a safety margin is, in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate estimate of the team's winning probability in the upcoming fixture. If the safety margin is sufficiently large, then it is enough to assume that the team's upcoming performance will not fall far below their expected goals in order for the bettor to feel sufficiently cushioned against bad luck. The safety margin is always dependent on the odds that the bettor accepts from the bookie. It will be large in certain odds, small at some lower odds, and negative when the odds is too low. However, even with a safety margin in the bettor's favour, he may lose his bet. For the margin guarantees only that he has a better chance of winning - not that loss is impossible.
Theory of Diversification
There is a close logical connection between the concept of safety margin and the principle of diversification. One is correlative with the other. Even with a margin in the bettor’s favor, an individual bet may work out badly. But as the number of such commitments is increased the more certain does it become that the aggregate of the profits will exceed the aggregate of the losses. This point may be made more colorful by a reference to the arithmetic of roulette. If a man bets $1 on a single number, he is paid $35 profit when he wins—but the chances are 37 to 1 that he will lose. He has a “negative margin of safety.” In his case diversification is foolish. The more numbers he bets on, the smaller his chance of ending with a profit. If he regularly bets $1 on every number (including 0 and 00), he is certain to lose $2 on each turn of the wheel. But suppose the winner received $39 profit instead of $35. Then he would have a small but important margin of safety. Therefore, the more numbers he wagers on, the better his chance of gain. And he could be certain of winning $2 on every spin by simply betting $1 each on all the numbers. (Incidentally, the two examples given actually describe the respective positions of the player and proprietor of a wheel with a 0 and 00.)
|
Main Menu >
English Football Forum >
Luton Town vs Sheffield Wednesday.
1
) 
Find all Topics Started by Fahrenheit
Find all Posts by Fahrenheit
Follow / Unfollow
PM Fahrenheit
Today
8:46 AM (2 hours ago)
4 Likes
Like
Today
8:50 AM (2 hours ago)
