*Diamond Member*
Posts: 52804
Liked By: 41055
Joined: 26 May 08
Followers:
49
Tipsters Championship:
Player
has not started
|
1x2 Kashiwa Reysol @3.20 On the surface, it may seem like a straightforward victory for the Antlers, who currently sit comfortably in fourth place with 49 points. In contrast, Kashiwa finds themselves languishing in 16th with just 33 points. Yet, as any seasoned football fan knows, the numbers can often be deceiving. Digging deeper into the statistics reveals a tantalizing narrative. Historically, Kashima has dominated this fixture, but a closer look at the last nine encounters tells a different story—these matches have been strikingly even, filled with draws and narrow victories for both sides. This shift suggests that Kashiwa may have unearthed a tactical approach that neutralises Kashima’s strengths. Key individual battles will shape the match, particularly between Kashima’s top scorer, Yuma Suzuki, and Kashiwa’s defensive stalwart, Tomoya Komayatsu. The outcome of this duel could dictate the flow of the game. In summary, while Kashima holds the home advantage and a stronger position in the league, Kashiwa has demonstrated tactical savvy and resilience. Expect a fiercely contested match where the underdogs might just prove to be more than a match for their lofty opponents. Don’t overlook Kashiwa—they could very well spring a surprise.
"Margin of Safety" as the Central Concept of Betting
A team's past ability to create quality chances is the expected number of goals that they should have produced. The expected number of goals in excess of the actual number of goals constitutes the "margin of safety". The margin is counted on to cushion the bettor against discomfiture in the event of a performance decline in the upcoming fixture. The soccer bettor does not expect the upcoming fixture to work out the same as in the past. If he were sure of that, the safety margin demanded might be small. The function of a safety margin is, in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate estimate of the team's winning probability in the upcoming fixture. If the safety margin is sufficiently large, then it is enough to assume that the team's upcoming performance will not fall far below their expected goals in order for the bettor to feel sufficiently cushioned against bad luck. The safety margin is always dependent on the odds that the bettor accepts from the bookie. It will be large in certain odds, small at some lower odds, and negative when the odds is too low. However, even with a safety margin in the bettor's favour, he may lose his bet. For the margin guarantees only that he has a better chance of winning - not that loss is impossible.
Theory of Diversification
There is a close logical connection between the concept of safety margin and the principle of diversification. One is correlative with the other. Even with a margin in the bettor’s favor, an individual bet may work out badly. But as the number of such commitments is increased the more certain does it become that the aggregate of the profits will exceed the aggregate of the losses. This point may be made more colorful by a reference to the arithmetic of roulette. If a man bets $1 on a single number, he is paid $35 profit when he wins—but the chances are 37 to 1 that he will lose. He has a “negative margin of safety.” In his case diversification is foolish. The more numbers he bets on, the smaller his chance of ending with a profit. If he regularly bets $1 on every number (including 0 and 00), he is certain to lose $2 on each turn of the wheel. But suppose the winner received $39 profit instead of $35. Then he would have a small but important margin of safety. Therefore, the more numbers he wagers on, the better his chance of gain. And he could be certain of winning $2 on every spin by simply betting $1 each on all the numbers. (Incidentally, the two examples given actually describe the respective positions of the player and proprietor of a wheel with a 0 and 00.)
|